Skip to content.
Guide

Internal Reporting Benchmarks for Speak-Up Culture

Benchmark your internal reporting against 15 years of global data. See how reports per 100 employees have changed over time and what this data reveals about your speak-up culture.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, a service provided by Google. You can learn more about how NAVEX processes your personal data by reviewing the NAVEX privacy statement.

Available in

Key takeaways

Measure performance

Benchmark your reporting rate against long-term global trends in reports per 100 employees

Understand cultural signals

See what reporting volume may show about trust, visibility and business risk

Plan next steps

Spot where your program might be under or overperforming compared to your peers

A group of young adults sit on steps in a modern, open space. Three people in front smile and look at a laptop, while others in the background chat and work, creating a collaborative atmosphere.

What is reporting rate?

Reporting rate or ‘reports per 100 employees’ is one of the most widely used risk and compliance reporting metrics. Relative to the size of your workforce, it shows how often employees raise concerns and includes all intake channels – web, hotline, open-door and more. 

This internal reporting benchmark gives you a clearer way to compare reporting activity across workforces of different sizes. It also gives you a more consistent way to track performance over time, especially as headcount changes, because it shows reporting activity relative to workforce size rather than raw case totals.

Two colleagues walk through a modern office hallway, engaged in conversation. The woman is holding and gesturing at a tablet, while the man listens, holding a laptop under his arm.

What is a good reporting rate?

There is no single number that defines a “good” reporting rate. A rate that looks high in one organization may be typical in another, and industry, geography, workforce size and program maturity all shape reporting volume. 

What matters is context, as without it, your reporting rate is just a number without a useful point of reference. NAVEX benchmark data helps you see whether your reporting level looks typical for your industry and size or whether you should find ways to improve.

Three people sit at a table in a modern office, engaged in discussion and smiling. One person walks past outside the glass-walled meeting room, creating a blurred motion effect.

Reporting rates are rising – what that means

Reporting rates have increased steadily over time – in fact, reports per 100 employees have risen by nearly 75% over the past 15 years, according to our annual benchmark report data.  

This increase reflects broader employee reporting trends: more employees are using the channels available to them, while reporting is becoming a more accepted part of healthy workplace and speak-up culture. Stronger whistleblowing protections, greater awareness and easier access to reporting channels are also helping drive change.

Learn more in the guide
Two women in business attire smiling and looking at a laptop together in a modern office setting. One is seated, and the other is standing, wearing glasses and leaning in.

What your reporting rate may indicate

Your reporting rate can offer useful context on how your reporting environment is functioning. On its own, it will not tell you everything, but it can help point to patterns worth paying attention to, such as trust in the speak-up process and channel visibility.  

A higher rate may reflect stronger awareness of reporting channels, greater confidence in the outcome and more faith that leadership will take concerns seriously 

A lower rate may suggest barriers such as low visibility, limited access, uncertainty about what to report or fear of retaliation 

Changes over time could signal shifts in culture, communication, leadership behavior or overall program engagement

Learn more in the guide

Why benchmarking your reporting rate matter

Looking at your reporting rate in isolation can be misleading. An internal reporting benchmark gives you a reference point, so you can see whether your reporting activity is broadly in line with peers or whether it stands out. 

That context helps you evaluate your risk and compliance program KPIs, spot potential gaps and track changes in reporting behavior over time.

Two women in an office smile and discuss work at a round desk with a laptop, notebook, and smartphone. One woman is sitting and the other is standing, holding a tablet. Sunlight enters through a nearby window.

What you’ll learn in this benchmark guide

This guide breaks down the key benchmarks and trends shaping whistleblowing and incident reporting – so you can better understand your data and act with confidence. You’ll learn:  

  • How to interpret reports per 100 employees as an internal reporting benchmark 
  • Global reporting rate benchmark trends across industries and regions 
  • What reporting volume may signal about employee reporting trends and culture 
  • Key drivers behind changes in incident reporting rate over time 
  • Ways to empower reporting behavior and build a culture of transparency
Download your guide
A woman in a pink blouse sits at a desk with a laptop, holding a mug and smiling, surrounded by indoor plants and soft natural light from a nearby window.

Who this benchmark guide is for

This guide is for anyone responsible for understanding or improving internal reporting. If you oversee compliance, ethics, risk, HR, or speak-up programs, this guide will help you interpret reporting activity and compare it to global reporting rate benchmarks. 

You’ll also find this useful if you are building or maturing your program and need a clearer view of how your reporting rate compares to your peers.

Download your guide
A smiling man wearing glasses and a navy sweater sits at a desk in a modern office, talking on his smartphone and working on a laptop.

Built on 15 years of reporting data

his benchmark guide is built on more than 15 years of global data from the world’s largest repository of incident data. This gives you a long-term view of reporting rate benchmarks, hotline reporting rate patterns and broader employee reporting trends. 

Get your focused guide to reports per 100 employees to understand what your reporting rate might signal and where to focus next. 

For the most recent whistleblowing and incident management trends across multiple metrics, explore our full 2026 Whistleblowing & Incident Management Benchmark Report.

Download your guide

Understanding reporting rates and benchmarking your program

  • What is a reporting rate?

    A reporting rate shows how often concerns are reported within your organization over a given period. It is a common way to measure reporting activity and understand patterns over time.

  • What are reports per 100 employees?

    Reports per 100 employees is one way of expressing reporting rate. It standardizes reporting volume against workforce size, which makes it easier to compare activity across organizations and track change over time as headcount shifts.

  • What is a good reporting rate?

    There is no single number that defines a “good” reporting rate. Higher reporting is not inherently a bad sign – it often reflects stronger trust in the process and gives you earlier visibility into issues or risks that might otherwise stay hidden.

  • Why are reporting rates increasing?

    Reporting rates have increased over the past 15 years because more employees know how to raise concerns and expect clear, accessible ways to do it. Stronger whistleblower protections, better reporting channels and more visible follow-through have all made speaking up a more normal part of workplace culture.

  • Does low reporting mean fewer issues?

    A lower rate of reporting doesn’t necessarily mean there are fewer issues. It can also suggest your employees aren’t speaking up because they are unsure what to report, don’t trust the process or don’t believe anything will happen if they speak up. That is why low volume needs context before it can be treated as a positive sign about your program health or business risks.