
The Finnish Whistleblower Protection Law
Explore the Finnish Whistleblower Protection Law, including compliance requirements, scope, and how to support and protect reporting in your organization

Explore the Finnish Whistleblower Protection Law, including compliance requirements, scope, and how to support and protect reporting in your organization

On 1st January 2023, the Finnish Whistleblower Act (1171/2022) entered into force. This marks the transposition of the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive’s requirements for the effective protection of whistleblowers reporting infringements of European and National Law.
The new legislation came into force on January 1st 2023. It states that Finnish private sector employers regularly employing at least 250 employees, and public sector employers regularly employing at least 50 employees, must set up a secure, confidential whistleblowing channel before the deadline of 1st April 2023.
The Act extends this requirement to all remaining private sector organizations employing at least 50 employees to establish a secure internal whistleblowing channel by 17th Dec 2023. This requirement will also apply to smaller organizations that operate within the financial sector. If the organization does not have an internal whistleblowing channel, or the whistleblower does not have access, the whistleblower can still get protection by submitting the report to the official external reporting channel established by the Office of the Chancellor of Justice on 1st January 2023.

The Act adopts the minimum standards for whistleblower protection outlined in the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. These requirements include:

By 17th December 2023, all Finnish organizations with at least 50 employees must set up a whistleblowing channel with comprehensive whistleblower protection. These protections include confidentiality, a prohibition against retaliation and no liability for disclosing necessary information to the report. This should be the first-line channel for whistleblowing in the organization.
The Act does not replace existing legislation. It instead acts as an additional measure of protection in certain legal areas – specifically around reporting serious breaches that could endanger the public interest, including violation of regulations concerning product safety, competition laws, public procurement, privacy and personal data protections, and environmental protection.
Whistleblowing in good faith is already protected under Finnish labor law, so violations of labor law covered by existing legislation are not included in the scope of the new Act.
Organizations must provide detailed information on whistleblowing channels, processes and rights. Instructions for using these channels should both encourage reporting and reduce excluded reports, and it must be possible to submit reports in writing or orally through the internal channel. Larger private sector organizations (>250 employees) must have set up their own related procedures for handling reports by the April 1st 2023 deadline.
All organizations, regardless of size, are obliged to protect the whistleblower from retaliation provided three conditions are met:

Organizations with fewer than 50 employees are exempt from the requirement to set up a whistleblowing channel. In this case, suspected breaches related to these organizations can be reported directly to the Finnish centralized official whistleblowing channel. If a smaller organization (<50 employees) has voluntarily set up a reporting channel, it must follow the statutory requirements.
Organizations in Finland do not have to accept anonymous reports. However, if they choose to accept them, a whistleblowing channel that allows communication with an anonymous whistleblower is recommended in case further information is needed. In addition, external service providers can be used for outsourcing whistleblowing channels, though the organization is still responsible for meeting statutory obligations associated with the channel.
If the organization does not take appropriate action on whistleblowing reports within three months, the whistleblower may report the breach to the competent authorities through the centralized whistleblowing channel. Under some circumstances, they may instead report directly to a competent authority. If the organization continues to take no appropriate actions after this is done, the whistleblower may have the right to publish the information about the breach.
If an organization is found acting in retaliation against a whistleblower or attempting to prevent them from reporting an issue, it may be required to pay compensation ranging from several thousand to an estimated 15,000 euros. Disclosure of identity without consent or engagement in retaliatory behavior can also result in compensation for the whistleblower’s loss in full.
7 Apr 2026 Carrie Penman
This article, from the 2026 Top 10 Trends in Risk & Compliance, discusses how past benchmarking is useful context for what’s to come in R&C.
Read more
Guides
Benchmark your internal reporting against 15 years of global data. See how reports per 100 employees have changed over time and what this data reveals about your speak-up culture.
Get the guide
Customer Stories
Read how Aderco implemented a centralized, secure, and confidential reporting process backed by effective case management and tracking.
See their story
Customer Stories
Hitachi, Ltd. is a global enterprise with approximately 280,000 employees worldwide, around 600 subsidiaries, and numerous group companies. To establish an effective internal reporting system, the company fully implemented the NAVEX Whistleblowing & Incident Management solution in 2020 and launched the “Hitachi Global Compliance Hotline.” Currently, the system receives approximately 2,000 internal reports annually from both domestic and international sources, functioning as a core infrastructure supporting global governance.
See their story
19 Mar 2026 Matt Kelly
Compliance officers need to speak the language of the business and communicate in terms that the board, management, and other leaders will understand.
Read more
18 Mar 2026 NAVEX Editorial Team
Speak-up culture is revealed through patterns, not promises. Learn which signals matter most for oversight and trust.
Read more
17 Mar 2026 NAVEX Editorial Team
Closing the loop on internal investigations turns findings into corrective action. Learn how remediation, accountability, and governance visibility strengthen compliance programs.
Read more
13 Mar 2026 NAVEX Editorial Team
Trust in speak-up programs is built after a report is made. Learn how investigations and follow-through protect whistleblowers and organizations alike.
Read more
10 Mar 2026 Jaclyn Jaeger
The European Commission’s digital package aims to simplify GDPR, AI Act and cybersecurity rules. Here’s what’s changing and what it means for compliance.
Read more
5 Mar 2026 Sarah Jo Loveday
This article, from the 2026 Top 10 Trends in Risk & Compliance eBook, discusses the signals pointing to an erosion of workplace culture.
Read more
3 Mar 2026 NAVEX Editorial Team
Inconsistent investigations create risk. Learn why consistency, not rigidity, is essential to defensibility, fairness, and long-term credibility.
Read more
24 Feb 2026 NAVEX Editorial Team
A defensible internal investigation is built on planning, independence, documentation, and fairness. Learn what makes investigations credible and able to withstand scrutiny over time.
Read more
A strong incident management system is critical to meeting Finnish whistleblowing laws, building trust, and protecting your organization.